ICD Update Platform
Skip Navigation Links
Home
ICD-10
Search/Filter/Report
   
 
Myalgic encephalomyelitis
Help

Descriptions of the Fields of a Proposal

The title of the proposal

Proposal ID: A numerical ID automatically given by the system.

Proposal State: The state that the proposal is in (see the Proposal Lifecycle and the Changing the State of a Proposal sections of the User's Guide for more information)

Update or Revision Proposal: This field shows whether the proposal suggests an update that can be achieved in the usual ICD update cycle or whether it is made for the ICD-11 revision.

Primary Code affected: The primary ICD cide affected by this proposal. (See also the section: Selecting where to attach the proposal in the user's guide)

Secondary Codes affected: See the section: Selecting where to attach the proposal from the User's guide. Volumes Affected: The list of ICD volumes that will be changed as a result of this proposal.

Proposal Type: The type of this proposal. The originator selects this from a predefined list

Change Reason: Similar to above, the originator selects this from a predefined list

Updates Specific to a Language Version*: This field is dislayed only when the proposal is suggesting a change to a specific language version of ICD. Not having this field means that the proposal applies to all language versions.

Detailed Description: This is where the user explains the proposal. He/She may provide the updated version of the ICD text using strikethrough text for the removed parts.

Rationale: This field includes the information on why this change is necessary.

Supporting web links*: Some web links attached to the proposal which are related to this proposal.

Supporting Publications *: A list of uploaded files that related to this proposal. They can be in one of these formats: pdf, doc, rtf, txt, or xls.

Proposal Summary: If the proposal is a revision proposal, a summary of the proposal and the discussions are prepared by the editor and placed in this field after the discussions.

Reason for Deletion*: If the proposal is deleted or rejected, the reason can be placed in this field. This field is accessible only when the proposal is Deleted or Rejected.

Scheduled Implementation Date*: Available only after the state of the proposal is changed to "Accepted".

VOTES*: Displayed only when the proposal is voted by the Update and Revision Committee. The summary of the voting is dislayed here. If the user clicks on "Show details" text then the page includes all votes given by the voting members together with their voting comments.

COMMENTS*: Displayed if there are comments attached sent by other users of the platform.

Add a new comment: Users may write their comments on the proposals by clicking on this link. If this link is not available, it shows that the proposal is closed for user comments at the moment.

 

*optional fields: Displayed if relevant information is available

Proposal ID : 2211  -  Proposal State : Accepted Proposal for Update

Implementation Date :  1/2018

Originator : Kristy Mabon  -  Last Update made by : Paula Tonel

Creation Date : 16-Mar-2016 19:43 CET  -  Last Update : 27-Sep-2016 15:01 CET

Previously Discussed in the group(s):

Primary Code Affected : G93.3

Secondary Codes Affected : None

Volumes Affected : 1,3

Proposal Type : Change to a code description that enhances the description rather than changes the concept

Change Reason : Need to reflect a change in clinical terminology

Detailed Description

Volume 1 - Tabular List

 

A85     Other viral encephalitis, not elsewhere classified

            ...

            Excl.:   benign myalgic encephalomyelitis (G93.3)

            ...

 

G04     Encephalitis, myelitis and encephalomyelitis

            ...

            Excl.:   benign myalgic encephalomyelitis (G93.3)

            ...

 

G93.3  Postviral fatigue syndrome

            Benign mMyalgic encephalomyelitis



Volume 3 - Alphabetical Index

 

Encephalomyelitis (see also Encephalitis) G04.9

- acute disseminated (postimmunization) G04.0

- - postinfectious G04.0

- benign myalgic G93.3

- due to or resulting from vaccination (any) G04.0

- equine Venezuelan A92.2G05.1*
- myalgic, (benign) G93.3

- postchickenpox B01.1G05.1*

...

Archived Versions
27/09/2016 Paula Tonel
27/09/2016 Paula Tonel
27/09/2016 Paula Tonel
12/08/2016 Kristy Mabon
12/08/2016 Kristy Mabon
19/04/2016 Andrea Simoncello
16/03/2016 Kristy Mabon
16/03/2016 Kristy Mabon
16/03/2016 Kristy Mabon
Rationale

The term “benign myalgic encephalomyelitis” was first introduced in the UK in 1956 by a former Chief Medical Officer (Sir Donald Acheson). The word "benign" was used because it was thought at the time that the disorder was not fatal (as poliomyelitis could be, with which it had some similarity), but it was quickly realized by clinicians that myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) was not a"benign" condition, as it has such high morbidity (i.e. such a lot of suffering and ill-health), so by 1988 clinicians had stopped using the word "benign" and referred to it as myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME). However, the ICD still uses the term "benign" in its classification. We propose that this be revised in ICD-10.



URC (Sep 27, 2016): this proposal was accepted in 2016.


Comments
12-Jul-2016 12:49 CET by Lars Age Johansson
Comment attached to the vote of the user for Round 1 of year 2016. Voted:Can't Decide

Agree in principle, but I’d suggest making ”benign” a NEM rather than deleting it. The term might still occur from time to time - sometimes you see very old-fashioned terms on death certificates...
12-Jul-2016 16:07 CET by Ulrich Vogel
Comment attached to the vote of the user for Round 1 of year 2016. Voted:Yes
Agree in principle with Lars, but I'd suggest that we delete the term only in the tabular and keep it as a NEW in the index.
13-Jul-2016 15:03 CET by Hazel Brear
Comment attached to the vote of the user for Round 1 of year 2016. Voted:Yes
Agree in principle if we can retain 'benign' in the index as a non-essential modifier.
10-Aug-2016 11:52 CET by Ulrich Vogel
Comment attached to the vote of the user for Round 2 of year 2016. Voted:Yes
Agree, if benign remains as a NEM in the index.
12-Aug-2016 20:13 CET by Kristy Mabon
Proposal updated for Round II voting
Canada has updated the content in the Detailed Description specific to Volume 3-Alphabeteical Index to address Hazel and Lars Age comments/suggestions from Round 1 voting. Benign has been retained in the index as a non-essential modifier for subterm myalgic
25-Aug-2016 21:52 CET by Kristy Mabon
Comment attached to the vote of the user for Round 2 of year 2016. Voted:Yes
Canada updated proposal August 12 -benign remains a NEM in index.
02-Sep-2016 20:32 CET by Olivier Guye
Comment attached to the vote of the user for Round 2 of year 2016. Voted:Yes
Agree in principle and in favour of keeping "benign" as a NEM in the index (I have the feeling that we keep the former terms in the index).